This blog is not about the horrific killing of the children of Uvalde, Texas at Robb Elementary School. After watching this horror happen over and over again, I cannot write about it without becoming so upset, I begin crying.
This leads me to write about another pet peeve of mine, the mistaken idea from some parents that their children will somehow suffer if they read material which has sex, religion, relationships, murder, and most other topics which are deemed unsuitable for children.
Do you see this magazine cover? This is a pretty calm one. No one is half naked and there is no blood on the cover. Compared to some, it is very tame. Of course, the headlines are straight out of the book of inflammatory language. "New Year's Killing of the Boy-Girl Stripper" and "all he wanted was to chop up Carol."
When I was in fourth grade, I spent the summer in Florida, going back and forth to my grandparent's houses. At my Grandmother Sloan's house, which was in the city of Lakeland, I was surrounded by romance novels of every kind. From the streets of Paris to London and even Charleston in the beginning, I followed women around in all their escapades where they normally ended up with the prize. (according to the book)
At my Grandmother Watkins' house, which was in the middle of an orange grove with no air and hot as hell in the summer, I would lay around during the hottest part of the day and read whatever my Aunt Shirley had scattered around. She was the youngest of my father's siblings and she normally had a supply of the above mentioned magazines to read, a few 16 oz. Pepsi's in the refrigerator and plenty of bologna to make fried bologna sandwiches for lunch.
I had never been told I could not read something that was in either house. Never. So I read everything. Now, before you say I must have been raised in a non-political, non-religious household, where anything went. Not true. I was raised as a Southern Baptist, church every Sunday and Wednesday and I always won the dollar in Sunday School for knowing the book, chapter and verse of every lesson we had. We also had separated classes between boys and girls.
By the 9th grade, I was reading on a senior in college level. Perhaps parents today might factor in interest when they are determining all the books they deem unfit for their children to read. Because the schools had just integrated and the students from the black high school had been trying to learn with subpar materials, Civics proved to be a difficult class for them. Because of my reading skills, I surpassed most of the students and was given extra work to do to stay busy. Mrs. TenEyck, my teacher, caught me reading the above book during Civics one day and took it away from me because she said it was not fit for a 9th grader to read. She was going to call my mother.
My Mom very respectfully told the teacher that I had gotten the book from her bookshelf and her children had never been told they could not read something in the house. She asked for Mrs. TenEyck to please return the book to me and she would make sure I was not reading for pleasure in Civics again.
I have never forgotten that. I am also still a voracious reader. I believe children should be allowed to flex their reading muscles on things which may interest them whether it is true crime or romance as in my case. Just a side note: my father read westerns. Those bodice ripping, good guy rides in on a white horse, gets the girls and kills the bad guys. I never found interest in them but Daddy carried one in his back pocket all the time.
Stop limiting your children. They are the ones who then stop reading. They are the ones who end up having to take reading classes because they are so far behind their peers.
Just another rant to keep my mind off the horrific, unnecessary murder of elementary school children because of politicians who can be bought.